X
Become a Trained LPI
®
Coach: September 17-19
Register Today!
Menu
Solutions
Solutions
Overview
LPI360
Self Empowered
Student Leadership
Research
Research
Overview
The Five Practices
Others Research
Use the LPI in Your Research
Training
Training
Overview
Develop Your Organization
Develop Your Student
Events
Blog
Resources
Resources
Overview
Community
Pricing
Sample Reports
Books
Try for Free
Shop
LPI
®
Login
Solutions Overview
The LPI 360
®
Self Empowered™
Student Leadership Challenge
®
Training Overview
Develop Your Organization
Trained Coach
Trained Facilitator
Certified Facilitator
Certified Master
Develop Your Students
Trained Facilitator
Certified Master
Research Overview
The Five Practices
Others Research
Use the LPI in Your Research
Resources
Pricing
Community
Certified Masters Directory
Community Resources
Books
Insights
White Papers
Webinars
Sample Reports
Press
Archive
Dealing With Feedback from an “Outlier”
Sep 22, 2020
Q:
The LPI
®
is invaluable in getting leaders to solicit feedback from others. But how do you deal with the question of the “outlier” when coaching a leader through his/her LPI report?
A:
If you facilitate The Leadership Challenge
®
Workshop or coach people through their LPI results, you’ve likely encountered this question in almost every engagement. In fact, this question kept coming up so frequently in workshops I was facilitating that I started addressing it before it was asked.
Our job as facilitator or coach is to help leaders approach their LPI feedback with an open mind, and giving people a lens through which to view their feedback is a pivotal part of our role. So, let’s start with the basics.
What is an outlier, anyway?
It’s essentially a data set from an observer that is significantly higher or lower than the leader’s self-scores and/or any of the other responders. That said, sometimes it is the leader’s own self-scores that are the outlier—either significantly higher or lower than the combined observer responses. However, it’s often outlier data from an observer that can trigger emotional responses from the leader.
What are people’s natural responses when they see outlier data in their reports?
Well, that depends on what kind of outlier data it is. If it’s higher outlier data, leaders often approach it with a “Well, wasn’t that person overly kind to me!” type of comment. On the other hand, if it’s lower, it’s as if there’s a flashing neon arrow bringing their gaze straight to it! Common responses include, “Well, I sure must have ticked this person off the day they filled this out!” and “This person is out to get me!” Low outlier data has the potential to trigger our defense mechanisms and can send us straight into assigning blame.
So, what are some ways to help leaders process low outlier data in a healthy manner that invites deeper reflection?
First, be sure to remind them that the numbers represent FREQUENCY OF OBSERVED BEHAVIOR and are NOT an indication of whether they are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ as leaders.
Second, you may want to gently remind them that perception IS reality. So, even if the outlier data is significantly different from the rest, it is incumbent upon them to ask what they can take away from it—whether they agree with it or not.
Encourage your leaders to look for the overarching messages in the data and not get hung up on the individual outlier scores. Point out that the majority of their observers experience their leadership behavior more frequently than the outlier, and that is great news!
Invite them to consider the observer category the outlier is in. Using the category of Co-worker, for example, you might ask if some of these observers are located in a different city or office site; we know that lack of proximity and exposure to a leader’s behavior on a consistent basis can influence responses. Have your leaders think through what practical changes in behavior they might make to create the most impact with their remote colleagues.
Note:
You may often find that leaders register people as observers who simply don’t have the consistent interaction to speak to their leadership behavior; in which case, low frequencies are simply an honest response.
Have leaders look for specific leadership practices where the outlier scores are especially low compared to other practices. What might that suggest? For instance, if there is a Direct Report respondent who has given significantly lower scores in Encourage the Heart behaviors vs Model the Way behaviors that could indicate that this person may need more focused encouragement than they feel they are currently getting. Try to help leaders identify ways to increase the frequency of those behaviors across the board, so that whoever that individual is starts to get more of what he or she needs. Plus, it won’t hurt the other direct reports to have more of a good thing!
Point out the open-ended comments at the back of the LPI report. Is there anything there that provides context for some of the outlier scores they are seeing?
Again, the goal is to help steer leaders toward the main themes and messages in the LPI data. What can they take from this feedback that they can put into action to improve the effectiveness of their leadership? Make sure to point them toward their strengths, encouraging them to keep focused on the leadership behaviors they are already doing frequently. Their outlier data is a part of their feedback story—valuable and important—but it shouldn’t be derailing.
Amy Savage
, a Certified Master of The Leadership Challenge
®
and a Certified LPI
®
Coach, is a consultant at FlashPoint Leadership, a Global Training Partner. Passionate about helping people live and lead out of their values and engage with their purpose, she can be reached at
[email protected]
.
Did You Like this Content?
Join our newsletter to get insights, updates and more!
Country*
United States
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia, Plurinational State Of
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Caribbean
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Central America
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Islands
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo, The
Democratic Republic of The
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polyneisa
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard Islands and Mcdonald Islands
Holy See (Vatican City)
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Democratic People's Republic Of
Korea, Republic Of
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao, People's Democratic Republic Of
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic Of
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Middle East
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
PANAMA
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Barthelemy
Saint Helena, Ascension of Christian da Cunha
Saint Kitts & Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelan
Saint Vincent & the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome & Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbar and Jan Mayen
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands, British
Virgin Islands, U.S.
Wallis And Fatuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
I have read and agree with Wiley’s
Terms of Use
and
Privacy Policy.*
Please send me special offers, newsletters and promotions from Wiley. See privacy policy for more details.
Enter security code:
Share This Post
More Articles that Might Interest You
Inclusion: The Key to Great Workplaces and Exemplary Leaders
5 Min. Read
Questions Leaders Should Ask Themselves When Introducing AI Into Their Organizations
4 Min. Read
Leadership's Role in the Emotional Paycheck: Cultivating Great Cultures
3 Min. Read
Unlock Leadership Today - Try the
LPI: Leadership Practices Inventory for Free!
Try for Free